Forum discussions are now taking place on Discord. For all account questions and concerns, please continue to contact Customer Support directly.

Keep updated on Pirate101 on Twitter @Pirate101, Facebook, Discord, and @KI_Alerts!

 Search  Updated Topics  Hottest Topics  Rules

Obsidian DeathDealers

AuthorMessage
Ensign
May 14, 2009
3
The damage is off for this weapon. It has 80 damage for a level 70 weapon. Is this intended? It wasn't fixed in test realm and it wasn't fixed in today's maintenance.

Was it overlooked or is the damage intentional.

@bat masterson can you respond
Commodore
Feb 12, 2015
970
I believe the low damage is intentional, since it gives THREE ranks of Burst Fire. Still, it might be a good trade off, if you mean to use standard attacks.
Lieutenant
Sep 04, 2013
150
Lookit Light on Oct 3, 2018 wrote:
I believe the low damage is intentional, since it gives THREE ranks of Burst Fire. Still, it might be a good trade off, if you mean to use standard attacks.
If that’s the case they’re a bit late on caring about the balance aspect of the game, scratch buff stacking and Angry Orchard weapons already exist and now they suddenly want to introduce trade offs? Why have a trade off on a weapon that would still be worse then other weapons even if it had normal damage?